Lorigerlimab, a bispecific PD-13CTLA-4 DART molecule in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A phase 1 expansion (exp) cohort

Background: Lorigerlimab (MGD019) is an investigational, bispecific Fc-bearing (IgG4) DART molecule designed to enhance CTLA-4 blockade on dual expressing, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, while maintaining maximal PD-1 blockade on PD-1 expressing cells. Lorigerlimab has approximate dose proportional PK across 1-10 mg/kg IV dosing Q3W, with sustained PD-1 receptor occupancy evident at doses >=1 mg/kg Q3W. MGD019-01 is a global first-in-human dose finding and activity estimating study of lorigerlimab in advanced solid tumors (AST). Method(s): The exp phase of MGD019-01 evaluates single agent safety, PK, and antitumor effects of lorigerlimab at the recommended dose for exp of 6 mg/ kg IV Q3W in 4 tumor specific cohorts. Confirmed responses were noted in each cohort. Preliminary results of the mCRPC cohort are reported here. Response evaluable pts received >=1 dose and had >=1 postbaseline imaging evaluation. Measurable lesions were evaluated per RECIST v1.1 and skeletal metastases assessed by bone scan. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as a >=50% (PSA50) or>=90% (PSA90) PSA decline from baseline with confirmation>=3 weeks later. Expression of proliferation marker, Ki67, and inducible costimulator (ICOS) by peripheral T cells was assessed by flow cytometry. Result(s): At data cutoff (9/10/22), 127 pts with AST received >=1 dose of lorigerlimab 6 mg/ kg. Median exposure was 10 weeks (range, 0.1, 94.4) with median of 4 infusions. 6 pts remain on therapy;36 discontinued for PD (n=13), AEs (n=17), or patient/physician decision (n=6). Treatment related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 109/127 (85.8%) pts. TRAEs occurring in>=15% of pts were fatigue, pruritus, hypothyroidism, pyrexia. Rates of grade >=3 TRAEs and immune-related AEs were 32.3% and 7.9%, respectively. AEs leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 22.8% of pts. There were no fatal AEs related to lorigerlimab. In the mCRPC exp cohort (n=42), pts had a median of 2 prior lines of therapy for CRPC, >80% received prior ART or taxanes;88% had visceral (liver, 26%;lung, 26%) or nodal disease and 95% had bone metastases. 42 pts were PSA response evaluable;35 were RECIST evaluable. ORR was 25.7% (9/35;9 confirmed PRs). Median duration of response was 16.1 weeks (range 6-25+ weeks). 5 responders remain on study, 4 discontinued for unrelated fatal AEs: COVID-19 (2) cardiac arrest (1) C. difficile infection (1). Confirmed PSA50 and PSA90 response rates were 28.6%(12/42) and 21.4% (9/42), respectively. Increased frequencies of Ki67+ and ICOS+ T cells were observed on day 8 posttreatment compared to pretherapy per the flow cytometry analyses from 35 pts. Conclusion(s): Lorigerlimab demonstrates a manageable safety profile with evidence of encouraging and durable antitumor activity in a chemotherapy refractory mCRPC population. Randomized evaluation of lorigerlimab in mCRPC is warranted.

Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer-metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2022.

BACKGROUND: Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation together with novel treatment options have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. However, we still lack high-level evidence in many areas relevant to making management decisions in daily clinical practise. The 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) addressed some questions in these areas to supplement guidelines that mostly are based on level 1 evidence. OBJECTIVE: To present the voting results of the APCCC 2022. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The experts voted on controversial questions where high-level evidence is mostly lacking: locally advanced prostate cancer; biochemical recurrence after local treatment; metastatic hormone-sensitive, non-metastatic, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; oligometastatic prostate cancer; and managing side effects of hormonal therapy. A panel of 105 international prostate cancer experts voted on the consensus questions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The panel voted on 198 pre-defined questions, which were developed by 117 voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. A total of 116 questions on metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer are discussed in this manuscript. In 2022, the voting was done by a web-based survey because of COVID-19 restrictions. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The voting reflects the expert opinion of these panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results are reported in the supplementary material. We report here on topics in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These voting results in four specific areas from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting and can help research funders and policy makers identify information gaps and consider what areas to explore further. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions always have to be individualised based on patient characteristics, including the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), co-morbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps where there is non-consensus and that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY: The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with healthcare providers worldwide. At each APCCC, an expert panel votes on pre-defined questions that target the most clinically relevant areas of advanced prostate cancer treatment for which there are gaps in knowledge. The results of the voting provide a practical guide to help clinicians discuss therapeutic options with patients and their relatives as part of shared and multidisciplinary decision-making. This report focuses on the advanced setting, covering metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and both non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. TWITTER SUMMARY: Report of the results of APCCC 2022 for the following topics: mHSPC, nmCRPC, mCRPC, and oligometastatic prostate cancer. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: At APCCC 2022, clinically important questions in the management of advanced prostate cancer management were identified and discussed, and experts voted on pre-defined consensus questions. The report of the results for metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer is summarised here.

A phase III, randomized, open-label study (CONTACT-02) of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus second novel hormone therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Cabozantinib inhibits multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, including the TAM kinase family, and may enhance response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. One cohort of the ongoing phase Ib COSMIC-021 study (NCT03170960) evaluating cabozantinib plus the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed in soft tissue on/after enzalutamide and/or abiraterone treatment for metastatic disease has shown promising efficacy. Here, we describe the rationale and design of a phase III trial of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus a second novel hormone therapy (NHT) in patients who have previously received an NHT for mCRPC, metastatic castration-sensitive PC or nonmetastatic CRPC and have measurable visceral disease and/or extrapelvic adenopathy - a population with a significant unmet need for treatment options. Trial Registration Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04446117 (ClinicalTrials.gov) Registered on 24 June 2020.

Tolerability of abiraterone (abi) combined with olaparib (ola) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Further results from the phase III PROpel trial

Background: The Phase III PROpel (NCT03732820) trial demonstrated at interim analysis a statistically significant clinical benefit from combining ola + abi in the first-line (1L) mCRPC setting vs placebo (pbo) + abi. Benefit was seen irrespective of a pt's homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) status;median radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) 24.8 for ola + abi vs 16.6 months for pbo + abi (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.81;P<0.0001). The safety profile of ola + abi was shown to be consistent with that for the individual drugs. We report additional interim safety analysis from PROpel. Methods: Eligible pts were ≥18 years with mCRPC, had received no prior chemotherapy or next-generation hormonal agent treatment at mCRPC stage, and were unselected by HRRm status. Pts were randomized 1:1 to abi (1000 mg qd) plus prednisone/prednisolone with either ola (300 mg bid) or pbo. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed rPFS. Safety was assessed in all pts receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment by adverse event (AE) reporting (CTCAE v4.03). Results: 398 pts received ola + abi and 396 pbo + abi (safety analysis set). At data cut-off (July 30, 2021), median total duration of exposure for ola was 17.5 vs 15.7 months for pbo, and for abi 18.2 months in the ola + abi arm and 15.7 in the pbo + abi arm. Anemia (n=183) was the most common AE in the ola + abi arm, and 34% of these 183 events were managed by dose interruption, 23% by dose reduction, and 8% resulted in treatment discontinuation. Anemia and pulmonary embolism (PE) were the only Grade ≥3 AEs in ≥5% of pts (anemia: ola + abi, 15.1% vs pbo + abi, 3.3%;PE: 6.5% vs 1.8%, respectively). Most PEs were detected incidentally on radiographic imaging (69.2% and 71.4% in the ola + abi and pbo + abi arms, respectively) and no pts discontinued. More pts in the ola + abi arm experienced venous thromboembolism (Table). Arterial thromboembolism and cardiac failure AEs were balanced between the treatment arms. No AE of myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia was reported in either treatment arm. COVID-19 was reported more frequently with ola + abi (8.3% vs 4.5%). Conclusions: PROpel demonstrated a predictable safety profile for ola + abi given in combination to pts with 1L mCRPC unselected by HRRm status. AEs of cardiac failure and arterial thromboembolism were reported at similar frequency in both treatment arms. The majority of PEs were asymptomatic. The safety profile of abiraterone was not adversely impacted by its combination with olaparib.

EXERCISE FOR METASTATIC CASTRATE-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER: A FEASIBILITY TRIAL IN PROGRESS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC (EXACT)

Introduction A global trial is currently investigating the impact of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on survival in advanced prostate cancer (the INTERVAL trial). To ensure greater accessibility, we designed a parallel trial (EXACT), to determine the feasibility of exercise in those contraindicated to HIIT. Methods Men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer being actively treated with androgen deprivation therapy and a novel hormone therapy (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) are eligible to participate in 12- weeks of home-based walking and strengthening. Participants complete physical (e.g. 6-min walk test and timed sit-to-stand) and quality of life (e.g. BPI-SF;EQ-5D-5L;FACIT-fatigue;FACT-P) outcomes at baseline (T1), 12 (T2) and 24 weeks (T3). This trial was adapted to enable remote recruitment and delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results To date, 118 patients have been screened, with 33 approached by their clinician to participate. 25 patients have consented, with 12 completing the trial without any intervention-related adverse events and 6 withdrawn. Recruitment and trial delivery was operational throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently positive trends are evident for physical and quality of life outcomes at T2 and T3. Conclusions Although this trial is ongoing, early trends suggest this intervention is safe and feasible for men with advanced castration resistant prostate cancer and could improve physical capacity and quality of life.

Incidence and outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of complicated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but it is still unclear if the risk of mortality is influenced by cancer type or ongoing anti-cancer treatments. An interesting debate concerning the potential relationship between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and SARS-CoV-2 infection has recently been opened in the case of prostate cancer (PC), and the aim of this multi-centre cohort study was to investigate the incidence and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostrate cancer (mCRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients with mCRPC who developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and recorded their baseline clinical characteristics, their history of PC and SARS-CoV-2 infection, and their oncological status and treatment at the time of infection. The primary study end point was the death rate and the possible impact of the patients' PC-related history and treatments on mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-four of the 1433 patients with mCRPC attending the participating centres (2.3%) developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 22 (64.7%) of whom were hospitalised. Most of the patients were symptomatic, the most frequent symptoms being fever (70.6%), dyspnoea (61.8%), cough (52.9%) and fatigue (38.2%). After a median follow-up of 21 days (interquartile range: 13-41), 13 patients had died (38.2%), 17 recovered (50.0%) and four (11.7%) were still infected. The number of treatments previously administered for mCRPC had a significant impact on mortality (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings contribute additional data to the current debate concerning the postulated protective role of ADT, which seems to be less in patients with metastatic PC.